Will in a tube
Rockwood
     The Rockwood Mailbag
archive mailbag who's who store promote promote

Express yourself!

Drop us a line! Head on over to The Rockwood Mailbag at any time to leave us a message! It's easy!

Consider it an experiment in web interactivity. Or, consider it a way to artificially inflate our hit count. Either way, just write in!

 

 

         Updated on February 27, 2007
   
February 22, 2007,

Woo! Engineer's Week!

1. Assuming that this savings accounts will not accrue any interest over the time period specified, Tim should have enough to buy the iPhone plus 424 dollars left over (total of $1,024). Work:

Starting on day 1 with 1 dollars, the amount in the account doubles with a period of 10 days, until day 101. This means the account doubles 10 times (days 11, 21, 31, 41, 51, 61, 71, 81, 91, and 101). Therefore total = 1 * 2^10, or 1024.

2. Assuming the document starts downloading at the same time that Tim starts walking, tim will be struck by the bus (he will have traveled 1.5 feet in front of the bus before the download is over). Work:

First, solve for time to download the 75 kb file at 9 kb/s. 75 - 9 * t = 0, giving t = 8 1/3 seconds. Using that amount of time multiplied by Tim's velocity of 4.5 ft/sec, we get 8 1/3 * 4.5 = 37.5 feet traveled. 36 - 37.5 = -1.5 ft. (a.k.a. ouch). Luckily, as Tim is both an engineer and an apple user, he has the strength of a thousand men, and recovers in time for the next problem.

3. Assuming that Tim has decided to go to his local vacuum park, and therefore will not encounter any lift or drag due to air resistance, the now obsolete iPhone will travel about 45.19 meters. Work:

First, find the vertical (Vy) and horizontal (Vx) components of the phone velocity (V0). Vy = V0 * sin 30 = 11 m/s, Vx = V0 * cos 30 = 19.053 m/s. We now need to solve for the amount of time it takes the phone to hit the ground. Looking at only vertical components, we see gravity acting downwards at 9.81 m/s/s, the initial velocity of 11 m/s, and the initial height of 1.5 m. Solving for time, we get the equation -9.81/2 * t^2 + 11 * t + 1.5 = 0. Using the quadratic formula to solve, we get t = (-11 +- sqrt(11^2 - 4 * -4.905 * 1.5)) / 2*-4.905. We can throw out the negative t, leaving us with a time elapsed of approximately 2.372 seconds. Then, we simply multiply the horizontal velocity by the time elapsed before the phone hits the ground, and find how far the phone traveled 2.372 s * 19.053 m/s = 45.19 m.

At least, that's how I remember math/physics. It's only been 3 years, and it's starting to fade fast.

Well, if I'm wrong, at least I spent my lunch break productively.

Also, by the way, even though the calendar is the best thing ever, and everyone should buy at least one, it appears to be missing a reference to Engineers Week. I think it's time for a angry letter writing campaign against calendar making companies.

--Greg
 

   
   
Well done, Greg! Apparently you remember your physics very well. We also like your suggestion about putting Engineers Week on next year's calendar. We admit we hadn't thought of doing that before, but since we celebrate it every year, we might as well. Heck, maybe doing so could get some engineering organization to sponsor us! Any takers?
 
   
   
February 22, 2007,

Just a thought for next year on the calendar. How about putting the website address on each page. I have had several comments about the calendar, and had to write down the address for them to find you online. Who knows, you might sell a few more calendars, and maybe start selling T-shirts as well?

--Jim Rockwood
 

   
   
Another excellent suggestion! Perhaps Engineers Week brings out the best in everyone. Consider that URL already planned, Jim. As for the t-shirts, we admit we've let our CafePress site stagnate, but maybe someday soon we'll get back around to putting something up there again. We'll be sure to bother all of you with little banner ads if we do.
 
   
   
February 26, 2007,

All in all, the Oscars were fairly agreeable. But I still have one question ... why wasn't the Thriller Dance nominated? : )

--Cassandra
 

   
   
Well, Cassandra, the official reason is that our Wedding Thriller Dance simply didn't meet the actual requirements for an Oscar. That's okay, though. What we really want is for someone to nominate us for a VMA this year. After all, there is a precedent there for videos from YouTube. We think a Thriller tribute is perfect!
 
   
     
Previous week's mail
 
   
E-mail this page to a friend.
 
© Copyright 2007 Brian Lundmark, all images and text on this page.
All rights reserved. Tell me about it!